Immunization vs incidence of Autism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Immunization vs incidence of Autism - Essay Example Immunization is one of the factors that have been implicated in the incidence of autism. Since 1999 there has been a controversy about whether thimerosal–containing vaccines contribute to the causes of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASDs) and neuro-developmental disorders (NDDs) in children. Autism affects not only the children living with the condition but the families of these children. Some siblings have to learn how to cope with a brother or sister who is autistic. It is of great importance to parents and has caused many parents to question the safety of immunizing their children. Several parents have refrained from immunizing their children against common childhood diseases. This has caused conflicts in schools where immunization is a requirement of a young child entering school. It is important therefore to understand as much as we can about this disorder and whether there is in fact a connection between vaccination and the disorder. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between the Autism Spectrum Disorder spectrum and immunization. The paper seeks to review the research evidence provided on both sides of the debate. Does the immunization of a child in fact increase the possibility of developing autism or is there no relationship between the chemicals in childhood immunizations, e.g. thimerosal and autism? It is important to try to determine how valid and reliable the research studies are. Parents need to be reliably informed about the consequences and possible dangers of immunizing their children. The analysis of the topic could help them in their decision about whether to immunize or not. An initial examination of the topic could help in the weighing up of the pros and cons of immunization against the possibility of the child being vulnerable to developing the autism disorder or any other neuro-developmental disorder. It

LLB Law, Media Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

LLB Law, Media Law - Essay Example ge of its duties, is guilty of contempt†¦Ã¢â‚¬ 1 The test as to what constitutes contempt of court was enunciated by Lord Russell in the English case of R v Gray: ‘Any act done or writing published calculated to bring a court or a judge of the court into contempt, or to lower his authority, is a contempt of court.’2 In every court proceeding, what every litigant is in search of is a good judgment and in most court proceedings involving trial by jury, having a good, reasonable and unbiased jury is the key to that. Taking a view from the Attorney General’s speech, it is true that the law of contempt was meant to arrive at a middle ground between competing interests. There are so many opposing interests to every trial. The law of contempt has at least three fundamental objects – providing a fair trial, ensuring compliance with the court’s orders and generally protecting the administration of justice. If these competing interests are balanced, it is the only way which requires the court process to be fair and that the community accepts the court’s decisions and obeys their orders. It is the duty of the trial judge always to warn the jury of the likely consequences of which any pre-trial publicity may have on the trial. The jury must always and constantly be cautioned to try the case on the basis of the evidence it hears and not on the basis of anything it reads in the newspapers or heard on radio or television. A question that should be asked at this point is that is this a reasonable position? If this is reasonable, how will the law be successful is protecting the rights of those concerned with a trial from intrusion by the media? How does the law attempt to balance the conflicting interest of all parties to the trial, and in particular, in relation to freedom of speech/freedom of the press and the right to a fair trial? Are the any dangers of a miscarriage of justice with regards to pre-trial publicity? It should be noted that a lot of jurors have become